Bushnell H20 10x42 Waterproof

Bushnell

Bushnell H20 10x42 Waterproof

Do you recommend this product?
Yes No
Report false content?
CompareClick is reader-supported, When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn more →

Statistics on Bushnell H20 10x42 Waterproof

Here we display statistical data about Bushnell H20 10x42 Waterproof

💰 Price $100*
📍 Categories
📌 Features
🔎 Views 364 Views
😍 Likes Likes
🔑 Specifications 27/42
👍 Rating -
💬 Review 1

* The statistical data that we present on this page are subject to change at any time

Add Review

Update Prices Bushnell H20 10x42 Waterproof

Here we display Update Prices data

Average Rating
-/5
score : 0
Based on Ratings
like or give your opinion about this page ? Add Review

Reviews, Pros & Cons Bushnell H20 10x42 Waterproof By Customers

This rating is based on customer reviews on this page, including reviews, opinions, pros and cons

  • Anonymous

    Recommend this

    08 February 2022

    Birdwatching is one of my favorite pastimes. The fact that they are compact and lightweight appeals to me.

    Pros 👍 Cons 👎
    • Easy to carry
    👍 Like
    👎 Dislike
    ⚠ Report
Advertiser Disclosure
General (6/9)
Country Of Origin
Dimension Length
Dimension Width -
Dimension Height -
Weight
Color
Release Year -
Warranty
Package Includes
Specifications (10/21)
Material
Focus Style
Size
Magnification
Lens Coatings
Prism Glass
Prism Coatings -
Optical Diameter -
Focal Length -
Field Of View - Angular -
Field Of View - Apparent -
Field Of View - Linear
Eye Relief
Exit Pupil
Near Focus
Interpupillary Distance Range (Max) -
Interpupillary Distance Range (Min) -
Diopter Adjustment Range -
Twilight Factor -
Relative Brightness -
Limiting Stellar Magnitude -
Features (11/12)
Waterproof
Fogproof
Diopter Adjustment
Nitrogen-Filled
O-Ring Sealed
Durable Rubber-Armored Coating
Night Vision
Auto Focus System
Floating Strap
Rain Protection Cap
Carrying Case
Tripod Adaptable -
Price (1/1)
Amazon
*Disclaimer. We can not guarantee that the information on this page is 100% correct. Read more