Nutribullet magic bullet® Blender


Nutribullet magic bullet® Blender

Do you recommend this product?
Yes No
Report false content?
CompareClick is reader-supported, When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn more →

Statistics on Nutribullet magic bullet® Blender

Here we display statistical data about Nutribullet magic bullet® Blender

💰 Price $49.99*
📍 Categories
📌 Features
🔎 Views 483 Views
😍 Likes 0 Likes
🔑 Specifications 21/37
👍 Rating -
💬 Review 1

* The statistical data that we present on this page are subject to change at any time

Add Review

Update Prices Nutribullet magic bullet® Blender

Here we display Update Prices data

Average Rating
score : 0
Based on Ratings
like or give your opinion about this page ? Add Review

Reviews, Pros & Cons Nutribullet magic bullet® Blender By Customers

This rating is based on customer reviews on this page, including reviews, opinions, pros and cons

  • Anonymous

    Recommend this

    01 December 2021

    It performs well for the price. I brought two of them, one for me and the other for my sister. It's quite simple to use. It's what we use for our smoothie diet. It dismantles everything. You can't go wrong for the price.

    Pros 👍 Cons 👎
    • Not too loud
    • Affordable
    • The cups are small and narrow
    • Plastic parts feel cheap and breakable
    👍 Like
    👎 Dislike
    ⚠ Report
Advertiser Disclosure
General (8/9)
Country Of Origin
Dimension Depth
Dimension Width
Dimension Height
Release Year -
Package Includes
Specifications (5/13)
Model No. -
Blade Type -
Material (Jar)
Capacity -
Power Source
AC Input Voltage
AC Input Frequency -
Features -
Cord Length -
Number Of Speed -
Number Of Programs -
Number Of Blades
Features (8/15)
Pulse Function
On/off Switch
Turbo Mode -
Chopper -
Locking -
Ice Crusher -
Smoothie Beaker -
Removable Bowl -
Detachable Blade Unit
Cable Storage
Dishwasher-Safe Parts
Overload Protection
Non-Slip Feet
LCD Display -
Price (1/1)
*Disclaimer. We can not guarantee that the information on this page is 100% correct. Read more