ALPS Mountaineering Lay-Z Lounger

ALPS Mountaineering

ALPS Mountaineering Lay-Z Lounger

Do you recommend this product?
Yes No
Report false content?
CompareClick is reader-supported, When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn more →

Statistics on ALPS Mountaineering Lay-Z Lounger

Here we display statistical data about ALPS Mountaineering Lay-Z Lounger

💰 Price $279.99*
📍 Categories
📌 Features
🔎 Views 666 Views
😍 Likes 0 Likes
🔑 Specifications 15/31
👍 Rating -
💬 Review 1

* The statistical data that we present on this page are subject to change at any time

Add Review

Update Prices ALPS Mountaineering Lay-Z Lounger

Here we display Update Prices data

Average Rating
-/5
score : 0
Based on Ratings
like or give your opinion about this page ? Add Review

Reviews, Pros & Cons ALPS Mountaineering Lay-Z Lounger By Customers

This rating is based on customer reviews on this page, including reviews, opinions, pros and cons

  • Anonymous

    Recommend this

    06 January 2022

    This is a brand-new item. But thus far, I'm extremely pleased with it. I'm looking forward to getting things done so I can sit in this chair on my patio and rest. It's simple to shut your eyes and go asleep or relax.

    Pros 👍 Cons 👎
    • Reclining
    • Easy to set up
    👍 Like
    👎 Dislike
    ⚠ Report
Advertiser Disclosure
General (5/9)
Country Of Origin -
Dimension Depth
Dimension Width
Dimension Height
Weight
Color
Release Year -
Warranty -
Package Includes -
Specifications (5/13)
Product Type -
Frame Material
Chair Fabric Material
Frame Durability -
Maximum Weight Capacity
Seat Width
Seat Height - Floor To Seat -
Suggested Use
Number Of Cushions -
Cushion Cover Closure Method -
Cushion Attachment Type -
Cushion Cover Material -
Cushion Fill Material -
Features (5/9)
Cushions Included
Carrying Bag Included -
Foldable
Reclining
Powder Coated Finish -
Cup Holder
With Canopy
Detachable Cushion -
Removable Cushion Cover -
Price (1/1)
Amazon
*Disclaimer. We can not guarantee that the information on this page is 100% correct. Read more